Skip to content

Forbright vs Pibank vs CIT Bank: Savings Rates Compared

Pibank, Forbright and CIT Bank compared on the rates each bank showed on October 14, 2026: Pibank leads with no minimum, Forbright pays one rate on any balance, and CIT's top rate needs a balance floor.

Updated
6 min read

Updated October 14, 2026: Pibank raised its rate after our September 25, 2026 update; Forbright and CIT are unchanged and show no promotional rate. This comparison uses each bank's published rate, read October 14, 2026: Forbright 3.85%, CIT 3.75% on $5,000 or more and Pibank 4.40%.

Forbright vs Pibank vs CIT Bank: Three High Savings Rates Compared

On the rates we read on October 14, 2026, Pibank leads at 4.40%, Forbright pays 3.85% and CIT pays 3.75% on balances of $5,000 or more. The 50 basis point spread between first and last that day is worth about $50 a year on $10,000. That is real money, but the conditions attached to each account matter at least as much.

Forbright Growth SavingsPibank SavingsCIT Bank Platinum Savings
APY3.85%4.40%3.75% on $5,000+
Rate read onOct 14, 2026Oct 27, 2026Oct 28, 2026
Monthly fee$0$0$0
Minimum depositno minimumno minimum$100
CatchVariable rate, online onlyNo ATM or checkingUnder $5,000 earns 0.25%
FDICDirect, Member FDIC, $250kVia Intercredit Bank, $250kFirst Citizens charter, $250k
ATM / checkingNeitherNeitherChecking available

Pibank: the top rate with the fewest strings

Pibank pays 4.40% APY with no minimum balance to open or maintain and no fees, read on Oct 27, 2026. There is no tier to hit and no deposit requirement, so dollar one earns the same rate as dollar fifty thousand. Pibank gives no end date for the rate. Deposits are held at Intercredit Bank, N.A., Member FDIC.

The weakness is everything around the rate. Pibank offers no ATM access and no checking account, so it works as a parking spot, not a place you spend from. The rate is variable, and Pibank says it can change at any time without notice.

Forbright: no minimum, no promo, no drama

Forbright Growth Savings pays 3.85% APY with no fees and no minimum deposit (read on Oct 14, 2026). Its page shows no promotional rate and no balance floor, so the same rate applies to every balance.

That makes Forbright the simplest account of the three: one rate, any balance, open online. On the rates we read on October 14, 2026, the trade-off is 40 basis points behind Pibank, about $40 a year on $10,000, and like Pibank it has no ATM card or checking attached.

CIT: the math that bites small balances

CIT's page, read Oct 28, 2026, shows no promotional rate. Platinum Savings pays 3.75% APY on balances of $5,000 or more and 0.25% below that, with $100 to open. That tier is how people open a CIT account for the headline rate with $2,000 and earn 0.25%.

If you will keep $5,000 or more in the account at all times, CIT pays its full 3.75% on a First Citizens charter, with CIT checking available if you want both under one roof. If your balance will dip below $5,000, it is not in this race.

Who should pick which

  • Pibank if you want the top rate of these three and do not need ATM or checking access.
  • Forbright if you want a single rate on any balance with no minimum and no promo to track.
  • CIT only if you will hold $5,000 or more and value having checking at the same bank.

If you do not want a catch, Marcus at 3.50% and Ally at 3.20% are the clean floor. See Marcus vs Ally, the savings catch report and the HYSA guide.

Not financial advice. Rates move. Read the bank page before you wire.

From the team behind Financeradar

Reach finance and tech readers in their inbox

Financeradar is built by Dupple, publisher of Finpresso (30K finance readers) and Techpresso (750K+ tech professionals). Sponsor an issue and get a report with the domains that clicked.

Work with us
hysaforbrightpibankcitcomparison
Share this article
Louis Corneloup

Written by

Louis Corneloup

Founder & Editor-in-Chief at Financeradar. Founder & CEO of Dupple, the publisher of 6 newsletters reaching 890K+ subscribers. Researches US financial products using a public methodology, see /how-we-rate and /editorial-policy.